Google
 
Web lab-retriever.net

View Full Version : Which brand is better?


Priceless Gem
06-23-2005, 09:01 AM
Brand 1
Ingredients: chicken & rice (min. 30%), turkey, pork, minerals.
Typical Analysis: protein 14.0%, oil 11.0%, fibre 0.5%, ash 3.0%, moisture 70.0%, Vit. A 5,000 IU/Kg, Vit. D3 200 IU/Kg, Vit. E 16 IU/Kg.

OR...

Brand 2
Ingredients: meat and animal derivatives (including meat claimed: min. 4 %),
Cereals (cooked rice: min. 4 %), Oils and fats, Derivatives of vegetable origin, Vegetable protein extracts, Minerals.
Typical Analysis: Protein 8.0, Oil 6.0, Ash 3.0, Fibre 0.4, Moisture 80.0. Copper 2.5 mg/kg as Copper Sulphate, Vitamin D 150 IU/kg, Vitamin E 100 mg/kg, Biotin 450 mg/kg.

OR....

Neither?

(Not mentioning any of the brand names)

I know nothing about the nutritional value side of things.

jcatkc
06-23-2005, 09:22 AM
Well, from the moisture %, it looks like we are talking about canned food.

Here is my ranking:

1. Neither
2. Brand 1
10. Brand 2 (meat and animal derivatives - YUCK!!!)

Glad to see a Scot on board. I am mostly Scot by blood (won't admit to the other percents).

Priceless Gem
06-23-2005, 09:28 AM
Well, from the moisture %, it looks like we are talking about canned food.
Yip - well, it's in pouch form which is pretty much like a can.

What area from Scotland?

jcatkc
06-23-2005, 09:38 AM
My Great Grandparents on my father's side came from Ayr.

On St. Patrick's Day, I always wear my tartan (red & yellow) instead of wearing green like everyone else. Everyone looks at me funny.